The starting point
85.9 days sales outstanding at the beginning of the period.
[Reported result]
One reported result from a professional services customer, and the workflow changes behind it.
85.9 days sales outstanding at the beginning of the period.
Invoice follow-ups, payment promises, and dispute routing connected into one process.
50.1 days after three months, 35.8 fewer days to collect.
What changed
The result came from changing the process, not from sending more reminders. Three things were connected that had been separate.
Recurring invoice follow-up ran as workflow rather than from individual inboxes.
Payment commitments were captured, dated, and tracked against the invoice.
Disputes were identified and routed to the people who could resolve them.
Measured on the same basis as the baseline, over three months.
| Period | DSO | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 85.9 days | n/a |
| Month 1 | 72.4 days | −13.5 |
| Month 2 | 59.8 days | −12.6 |
| Month 3 | 50.1 days | −9.7 |
FAQ
No. It is one reported customer outcome. Your result depends on your baseline, customer behaviour, workflow design, and adoption.
Record a baseline and a defined evaluation period before you start, then compare completed work, unresolved exceptions, and the finance outcome together.
The same DSO definition and the same customer population at both ends. The customer above was measured on a consistent basis across the three months.
Unapplied cash, disputed invoice volume, promise-to-pay reliability, and the age of open exceptions. A DSO number moving on its own does not tell you whether the process improved.
Ask the Flowwiz team during a demo. Reference conversations are arranged directly rather than published here.
Start
Bring your workflow, your systems, and who approves what.