See the whole position
Cash, spend, and unapplied items from one place rather than three systems and a spreadsheet.
Flowwiz / CFOsLeverage without
[For CFOs]
Leverage without
adding headcount.
Visibility and control across cash collection, spend, reconciliation, and close, without another layer of coordination.
Set the boundaries
Approval limits, confidence thresholds, and escalation rules defined once and applied everywhere.
Get the reason, not just the number
DSO moving is not an explanation. The workflow shows which segment, which policy, or which account owner drove it.
Working capital
The parts of the month that do not need a CFO.
Follow-ups, routine approvals, and status questions should not be competing for the same hours as the decisions that actually need you.
This week
| Item | Owner | Amount | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash collected | AR agents | $41,300 | Applied |
| Promised, due this week | AR agents | $25,450 | Tracked |
| Unapplied cash | Needs an owner | $9,200 | Blocked |
| Spend approved inside policy | AP agents | $18,940 | Cleared |
| Approvals above $50K waiting | You | $127,000 | Waiting |
Root cause
DSO alone does not tell you why.
A single number can move without explaining what happened: a late-paying segment, a policy gap, or one account owner’s book. The workflow keeps the reason attached to the movement.
- 01Baseline
The starting DSO and the period you are measuring against.
- 02Movement
What changed, by segment, owner, and customer.
- 03Cause
The disputes, promises, and payment behaviour behind the change.
- 04Action
Which workflow change would move it, and what it would take.
- 05Result
The outcome measured on the same basis as the baseline.
FAQ
Before you go further.
What should we bring to a demo?
Your finance priority, the systems involved, who approves what, and the outcome you want to measure.
How should we evaluate value?
Compare your baseline, the work completed, the exceptions still open, and the finance outcome over a defined period.
Will this reduce headcount?
The design assumption is augmentation. Agents take the repetitive coordination; people keep the judgement calls on customers, vendors, and anything high-risk.
How quickly can we see something?
One workflow with a clear owner and measurable end state is the usual starting point. Define the baseline before you start so the result means something.
What does the board get?
The same records your team works from, with the exceptions and their owners visible rather than summarised away.
Start
See it with your team’s context.
Bring your workflow, your systems, and who approves what.