Flowwiz / Controllers

[For controllers]

Both sides of the ledger.
One system.

You run receivables and payables. Most tools are built for one or the other, so you stitch the answer together yourself.

01

Both sides at once

Receivables and payables in one place, instead of stitching an answer together from two systems.

02

Exceptions with context

The invoice, the communication, and the reason for the routing arrive together.

03

A trail you can follow

Context, decision, and action recorded so any outcome can be explained later.

The gap

Point tools answer one side of the job.

Your role covers receivables and payables. Most tools are built for one or the other, so the visibility you need is assembled by hand.

An AR tool knows
  • Collections status
  • Customer risk
  • Promise-to-pay history
  • Dispute activity
But not
  • Vendor spend in flight
  • Approvals waiting
  • Bill variances open
  • Budget position by department

Hidden cost

It is never one big thing. It is a hundred small ones.

None of these is individually hard. Together they are what actually stresses a finance team.

Where the hours go
  • Matching an email remittance to the right invoice
  • Re-keying a payment confirmation that arrived by email
  • Chasing a reminder that should have auto-paused
  • Finding who has visibility into a customer or vendor thread
What replaces it
  • Remittance read and matched from the allocation detail
  • Payment confirmation logged to the record automatically
  • Reminder paused the moment a promise is captured
  • One shared timeline per customer and per vendor

FAQ

Before you go further.

Can we retain human review?

Yes. Review points are configured per workflow, and anything outside policy stops for a person before it executes.

What should we inspect first?

Follow one exception from the initial signal through review to the final recorded action. That path shows you whether the controls are real.

How is the audit trail structured?

Every input, classification, rule applied, approver, and action is timestamped and traceable to the record it concerns.

Does this change our month-end process?

It removes the search. Close reads the state the workflows have been maintaining all month rather than reconstructing it at period end.

How do permissions work across AR and AP?

Role and department scoped, so a receivable owner and a payable owner see different records from the same platform.

Start

See it with your team’s context.

Bring your workflow, your systems, and who approves what.

Book a demo

REVIEW Before the decision

The context, then the call.

Atlas Services has disputed invoice INV-1039 ($8,400). The purchase order reference on the invoice does not match the PO on file, and the customer has asked for a corrected copy before paying.

Agent recommendation

Confirm the correct purchase order with the account owner, reissue the invoice, and hold the collection reminder until the dispute is closed.

See this workflow in a demo