Permission by responsibility
Role and department rules decide who sees a record and who can act on it.
[Controls]
Approval limits, confidence thresholds, and escalation rules are yours to define. Sensitive actions route to a person first.
Role and department rules decide who sees a record and who can act on it.
Anything outside policy routes for human sign-off before it executes.
Context, decision, and action recorded together, so any outcome can be reconstructed.
Control points
The controls are configuration, not policy language. Each one is a threshold or a rule you can point at.
Role and department permissions decide visibility and action rights.
Amount, category, and vendor rules decide what can auto-approve.
A confidence floor decides what the agent may act on unsupervised.
Anything outside those bounds stops for a named approver.
The decision, the approver, and the action are written to the audit trail.
FAQ
It does not have to. Review is configured around the decisions your team needs to control, and everything else is recorded instead.
Review role permissions, department access, approval requirements, and audit records with the Flowwiz team against your own policy.
Yes. Approval routing enforces SOD rather than assuming it, and self-approval can be blocked outright.
The input, the classification, the rule applied, the approver, and the action, timestamped and traceable to the record concerned.
Yes. Visibility and action rights are scoped by role and department, so the two sides can be governed separately.
Start
Bring your workflow, your systems, and who approves what.