Know who to follow up with
Overdue invoices and payment commitments ranked by risk, not just by age.
[For receivables teams]
Reminders, replies, promises to pay, and disputes on one timeline, with the reason an invoice is unpaid in front of you.
Overdue invoices and payment commitments ranked by risk, not just by age.
A payment promise and a dispute need different next steps, and the difference matters.
Exceptions routed with context, and the account timeline updated as the work moves.
The day
The objective is not more reminders. It is to spend attention on the accounts that need it and leave the rest alone.
Overdue invoices, promises due, and disputes in one queue.
Promises, disputes, queries, and remittance details separated automatically.
Light touch, active follow-up, internal chase, or route to the account owner.
Timeline, reminder state, and owner notification kept in step.
FAQ
Yes. Sequences, timing, tone, and escalation points are configured around the responsibilities your team already has.
They are classified and attached to the account, so a promise pauses the sequence and a dispute stops it and raises a task.
No. Mail sends from your own domain and the account owner stays in the loop. The difference is that the routine chasing no longer needs their time.
Risk scoring surfaces them earlier, so the follow-up starts before the invoice is overdue rather than after.
Yes. Every reminder, reply, promise, and decision sits on one timeline per customer.
Start
Bring your workflow, your systems, and who approves what.