Pick the workflow
Choose repeated work with a clear trigger, an owner, and an observable end state.
[Resources]
The workflows to pick first, the controls to set, and the numbers worth measuring.
Choose repeated work with a clear trigger, an owner, and an observable end state.
Decide which exceptions and actions require a person before anything is enabled.
Record a baseline and a period, then compare the work and the result together.
Evaluation
Most disappointing automation projects picked the wrong first workflow, or never defined what success was going to look like.
Controls
For each action the workflow can take, decide who may perform it and what context they need to see.
Everything the workflow could do, including sending email and scheduling payment.
Amount thresholds, categories, and vendors that can proceed without review.
A person per boundary, not a shared queue.
Follow a single exception end to end before enabling the workflow.
Confirm the audit trail explains the decision to someone who was not there.
Measurement
Emails sent and hours saved are easy to report and easy to game. Compare the work against the finance outcome you set out to improve.
FAQ
The workflow owner, the controller or approver, and someone who understands the system connections. Missing any one of the three tends to stall the decision.
No. Compare completed work and exception quality against the finance outcome you intended to improve, measured on the same basis at both ends.
Long enough for the workflow to run through at least one full cycle of the process: a month for collections, an invoice cycle for payables.
Your finance priority, the systems involved, who approves what, and the outcome you want to measure.
That is what the evaluation period is for. Start with one process, measure it honestly, and expand only once it holds.
Start
Bring your workflow, your systems, and who approves what.